IGP UKCORD — Docs from Ukraine & Latvia prove Quid Pro Quo

Chris Coleman: 'Oh, God, you didn't just say that'

CitySt.Paul,DFLArtImpeach,HorowitzReport,OutsideCounselieLillehaugAgenda19Dec2019

           NADLERS JUDICIARY REPORT CRPT-116hrpt346.pdf   Now Void on 2nd Article  https://www.dailyconservative.com/sc3/supreme-court-intervention-threatens-one-of-two-impeachment-articles.htm

Trump Hints At Obama Investigation

The second article of impeachment passed by the House Judiciary Committee earlier Friday on a party-line vote accuses President Donald Trump of “obstruction of Congress” because he appealed to the courts rather than immediately obeying congressional subpoenas.

Horowitz Report 

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

The Department of Justice (Department) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) undertook this review to examine certain actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department during an FBI investigation opened on July 31, 2016, known as "Crossfire Hurricane," into whether individuals associated with the Donald J. Trump for President Campaign were coordinating, wittingly or unwittingly, with the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Our review included examining: • The decision to open Crossfire Hurricane and four individual cases on current and former members of the Trump campaign, George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Paul Manafort, and Michael Flynn; the early investigative steps taken; and whether

                                 Sharons Disclaimer; Loyal Trump Supporter, Council Whisper

City St.Paul,MN FROM 2004 TO 2012 and RICO Dismissal 2017 Fed.JUDGEDavis.
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14773354
                          Sharons Trust Triology unabated 4 years.
http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf
                         MNAG KEITH ELLISON without his law license 
https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2019/Documents/JourneyHomeMinnesota_SummonsAndComplaint.pdf
PARTIES
                                                    3. Keith Ellison, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota, is authorized under Minnesota Statutes chapter 8; the Minnesota Charitable Solicitation Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 309.50– .61; the Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation Act, Minn. Stat. ch. 317A; the Supervision of Charitable Trusts and Trustees Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 501B.33–.45; and common law authority, including as parens patriae, to bring this action to enforce Minnesota’s laws, to protect charitable assets held in the public interest, vindicate the state’s sovereign and quasi-sovereign interests, and to remediate all harm arising out of—and seek full relief for—violations of Minnesota’s laws.
                                               4. Journey Home Minnesota (“JHM”) is a domestic nonprofit corporation organized under Minnesota Statutes chapter 317A, the Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation Act. JHM’s registered address with the Minnesota Secretary of State is 899 Cobb Road, Shoreview, Minnesota 55126. JHM registered with the AGO as a soliciting charitable organization pursuant to the Minnesota Charitable Solicitation Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 309.50–.61, in December 2016. The address provided to the AGO by JHM in its initial registration documents is 855 Village Center Drive, Box 319, North Oaks, Minnesota 55127. 5. Huffman resides at the same address as JHM’s registered office address—899 Cobb Road, Shoreview, Minnesota 55126. Huffman has served as a director and officer of JHM, including as its chairman, president, and executive director. 

                                Sharon’s discovery of Treason by city officials in all realestate matters: Forcing repeal of State and Federal Laws. Cooking the Fidicuary Books by Mail Fraud , Extortion, Complicity, Theft of Personal Property,defrauding the State of Minnesota and the United States of America, http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com
 sharon4council.blogspot.com
by mail fraud, confusion,stacking,blatant trespass on private property in a “Patterned Enterprise” for Greed, to conspire to commit Murder by WATER SHUTOFF www.sharonanderson.org. 
                                  FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF A SUIT FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER AUTHORITY OF ARTICLE I, SECTIONS 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 & 10 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JUDICIAL NOTICE re: MS2.724 of City and County Attorneys, Lawyer Mayors Treasonable Bad Behavior.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/hud-sued-for-records-of-obama-administration-involvement-in-controversial-st-paul-mn-housing-discrimination-case/

https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice. https://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/

City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 12/18/2019 at 3:30 PM

AO 19-66

1

2

Administrative Order

Amending the 2019 spending budget for the Office of Technology and Communications.

1. OTC Financial Analysis AO 19-66

RES 19-2142

1

5

Resolution

Appointing the firm of Moss & Barnett under the direction of Brian Grogan as special counsel representing the City of Saint Paul in the matter of City of Chicago, et al v. Federal Communications Commission and the United State of America.

Appointing the firm of Moss & Barnett under the direction of Brian Grogan as special counsel representing the City of Saint Paul in the matter of City of Chicago, et al v. Federal Communications Commission and the United State of America.

Sponsors:

Amy Brendmoen

Attachments:

1. Agreement between City and Moss & Barnett.pdf, 2. Amendment to Agreement between City and Moss & Barnett.pdf

199 F3d 424 City of Chicago v. Federal Communications ...

https://openjurist.org › city-of-chicago-v-federal-communications-commiss...

1. 
   

CITY OF CHICAGO; TEXAS COALITION OF CITIES ON FRANCHISED ... v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

CITY OF CHICAGO v. COMCAST CABLE HOLDINGS | FindLaw

https://caselaw.findlaw.com › ...

1. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1235445.html

Chicago accepts the FCC's understanding of the difference between data and telecom services (but see Brand X Internet Services v. FCC, 345 F.3d 1120 (9th ...

City of Chicago v. Federal Power Commission, 385 F.2d 629 ...

https://casetext.com › ... › City of Chicago v. Federal Power Commission

1. 
   

F.C.C. ConsolidateUnable to persuade the cable operators to resume payments, Chicago filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the operators must comply in full with the contracts and ordinances.   The suit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County.   Invoking 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1441(b), defendants removed the proceeding to federal court.   They asserted that the City's action arises under federal law either because the demand for payment rests on 47 U.S.C. § 542(a)-which reads:  “Subject to the limitation of subsection (b), any cable operator may be required under the terms of any franchise to pay a franchise fee”-or because the meaning and effect of § 542(b) will be the only issue contested in the litigation.   The district court denied the City's motion to remand, concluding that federal adjudication is appropriate because the City's complaint “implicates ․ provisions of the Communications Act” and the FCC's order.  Chicago v. AT & T Broadband, Inc., 2003 WL 1888839, (N.D.Ill. Apr. 14, 2003), 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6268 at *9.   A few months later the district judge held d Edison Co. of New York v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, ... depreciation, and the City of Chicago then moved the Commission to decide the  ...